Derevo Detstva; Where the Wild Things Are

This Russian animation of a child’s nightmare is just incredible. The video is in the top 20 viral video list and the soft and dreamily drawn artwork is beautiful. According to the person who uploaded it,

it was drawn by pastel penciles on paper, animated in computer, but not in 3D programmes, all is 2D :)

It’s a kind of Where the Wild Things Are meets Surrealist art meets New Media. 

safariscreensnapz011

Speaking of Where the Wild Things Are, one of my favourite children’s classic picture books, it is being made into a realistic movie. Here’s the trailer:

Apparently the children’s author Maurice Sendak is “thrilled” at the film version of his book, however I am not yet convinced – maybe after years of teaching children’s literature and studying the picture book images it feels like too much back-story is filled in (always a problem with any movie interpretation of a well-loved book of course). However, this trailer also hit the top 20 viral video list last week, so its getting a lot of buzz.

My Digital Fiction Presentation for Futures in Literacy Conference

Harry Potter and the Spoiling Phenomenon

By 9:01 am tomorrow Australian time we’ll all know the answers to the following:

- Did Harry’s scar really contain a Horcrux that carried a bit of Voldemort and ultimately mean Harry has to kill himself to kill Voldemort?

- Does Hermione sacrifice herself to save Ron?

- Does Harry sacrifice his wizardry skills and become a Muggle?

- Is Dumbledore really dead?

- Which half a dozen or more people die?

The latest lot of spoilers about Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – some fake and some real – to be unleashed on the internet have caused an uproar with fans, and a media splash which is almost suspicious because of the additional hype it is creating 24 hours before the books release.

I’ve blogged about this before but its worth mentioning because once again it highlights the phenomenon of spoiling and the difference between “acceptable” fan culture of spoiling and the “unacceptable” act of hacks or media unfairly spoiling.

In Harry Potter fan forums everywhere, fans have spent countless hours debating the possible outcomes for the final HP book.  They have dissected plotlines from every book to date, and analysed transcripts of every single interview ever done with JK Rowling.  They have examined JK Rowling’s literary devices to explore any foreshadowing she might have done (i.e. Ron sacrifices himself for Harry in the Chess game in an earlier book, therefore….), to explore every nuance of every character (Professor McGonnigal came close to sacrificing herself for Hagrid, therefore…), and are studying Greek mythology (What parallels might exist between the Greek Hermione and the HP Hermione?) to find out clues.  They’ve compared UK editions with US editions and found that some edits weren’t included in one but were in the other. They’ve analysed patterns across books to make new predictions.  They have explored every spell ever used to predict how it could make a come-back in the final battle scene (the time turner is a popular theory). They have analysed the cover art of all editions and all countries where the cover is known for cover spoliers.

So when somebody comes along and just tells them the answers – whether true or false – it makes fans angry for two main reasons:

1) it spoils the pleasure of the reading experience, and this is the one most people can relate to – we enjoy the pleasure of predicting, picking up the clues as we read, and either having our ideas confirmed or being shocked and surprised by clever plot twists

2) the person doing the telling didn’t do any of the hard work to piece together the puzzle, and it feels like they cheated.

Some forums (like Chamber of Secrets) are so concerned about the possibility of unsanctioned spoiling, that they have closed now until AFTER the book has been released, to prevent it!

The only trouble with all of this predicting and piecing together of clues is that some fans will be disappointed if their predictions don’t come to pass.  Of course, that is why I predict that HP fan fiction will live on for some years to come.

The Simpsons and my “Today Tonight” Interview

The Simpsons Family

Hey, I was on Australian television again! Did anybody see me on the current affairs program called Today Tonight? I think the show aired while I was away in the States. This time I was talking about “The Simpsons”, media and pop culture, and fan fiction. Below is a cleaned up version, more or less, of what I said.

Continue reading

I’m Heading Off for June to Speak, Research, Speak, Plan more Research etc etc…

The major speaking event I have is the featured session at the NMC Summer Conference. I was specifically invited to speak about a “bit of everything” related to my research, so here’s the slides that accompany the talk. I hope I can arrange an audio stream to support the slides for the near future.

And here is the line-up for our panel session at the ECAR conference:

ecar.jpg

J K Rowling: “No spoilers please!”

USA Today is reporting that fans of Harry Potter are upset that they have been receiving alleged spoilers for the final novel in the Harry Potter series, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (due to be released July 21st, 2007).

“If Harry dies, we don’t want to know about it until J.K. Rowling decides to tell us,” Leaky Cauldron webmaster Melissa Anelli wrote. “And if you decide to tell us before that, you’ll incur the wrath of a staff of almost 200, most of whom have been waiting almost 10 years for these final revelations and can NEVER get back the moment you rob by spoiling them.”

“That’s some wrath right there. We own pitchforks, hot wax and feathers. And we’re not afraid to use them.”

I find this fascinating because a large “spoiler” culture exists with fans of movies and tv shows among. I’ll never forget reading fan websites of Survivor when it was in its second season and seeing how much time and effort the fans spent analysing every tiny part of every screen cap from every second of the 2 minute “next week on survivor” teasers each week. The game was in the analysis of editing techniques, visual clues from the screen cap, and a real knowledge of media literacy.

In this case, I think the fans love to predict and hypothesise from clever analysis of plot and character and author, but they really do not want to be spoonfed these things by somebody who works at the publishing company. There’s a difference between good spoiling and bad spoiling!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 390 other followers